Over 59607

Values Politics

Draft-Dodger Trump Said Sleeping Around Was My ‘Personal Vietnam’ -

TAGS: donald trump draft dodger gi joke toy soldier gop republican rino clown progressive statist hack new york liberal values vietnam war elitist blowhard windbag loser
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

GrouchoMarxists - November 17, 2017, 8:39 pm
Mot claiming any original thought here choker.... I just seem to recall your lame memes on the subject... I'm certain you recall them... You certainly vomited on every one of them. Tissue?


Idiotic Trump Fanatics -

TAGS: donald trump supporters trumpanzees trumpists trumpism rinos progressives new york liberal values statism big government tyranny elitist dumbing down of america idiocracy
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

GrouchoMarxists - November 17, 2017, 8:38 pm
You must really feel intimidated... or stupid..


Draft Dodger Trump -

Draft Dodger Trump -

CONSERVATIVE RE-WRITE - Not so attractive as the original.

TAGS: conservative values
Rating: 2.78/5

More politifakes by PapaFox

Renza - February 27, 2013, 5:52 pm
There's a pretty clear difference between a satirical presentation of religion being used, and the actual bastardization that politicians like to use, of which the satire is meant to point out.
PapaFox - February 27, 2013, 1:49 pm
You wouldn't be the first I've seen do just that. Hell, you wouldn't be the first I've seen even today.
falconfan00 - February 27, 2013, 1:17 pm
C'mon man. Your cold busted doing the very thing you accuse the other side of being wrong about, and there's supposed to be some justification for that? You can use Jesus but I can't? What if i say all my religious posts are protests, can i do it then?
PapaFox - February 27, 2013, 12:52 pm
In a protest over the way religion is often mis-used on the right.
falconfan00 - February 27, 2013, 12:32 pm
I believe you Papa and i agree with you. But i will remind you that you used Christ and scripture in this very post for political reasons. You did the very thing you have a problem with the other guy doing, using Jesus to sell your politics.
PapaFox - February 27, 2013, 10:16 am
I have no problem with religion, being a believer myself. I DO have a problem with the way it's often abused for political reasons or filling televangelist's pockets.
falconfan00 - February 27, 2013, 10:05 am
Since you appear unaware, please refer to large picture of Jesus along with modified scripture from the Bible to determine who brought up religion. That would be the original poster, not yours truly. To imply I brought it up would be error on your part.
Renza - February 27, 2013, 8:32 am
If people didn't bring up religion, they probably wouldn't get related responses, often how things work. Anyone's welcome to state their opinion, it may just be responded to with facts.
falconfan00 - February 26, 2013, 4:21 pm
Nice jab at the Christian. It must be great to know you can be as inconsiderate as you like to someone knowing that if they return the favor, you can point at them and call them hypocrits for coming down to your level. Stay classy Ren.
Renza - February 26, 2013, 4:17 pm
An imaginary figure can't save a country, fyi. You may also wish to consider broadening your views of government and charity. Just because helping the poor isn't their sole purpose doesn't mean they don't do it.
PapaFox - February 26, 2013, 3:33 pm
If you prefer to remain ignorant of our country's history, knock yourself out.
falconfan00 - February 26, 2013, 3:10 pm
So the government, by your definition, is a charity?? And charities have armies? Conduct foreign policy? Run agencies like the CIA and FBI? Build interstates? Run prisons? Or, most importantly, force donations under penalty of law?? Wow dude.
PapaFox - February 26, 2013, 2:54 pm
Wrong. The US Government has been helping the poor since the country was formed. http://www.welfareinfo.org/history/
falconfan00 - February 26, 2013, 2:48 pm
Government is not a charitable institution, no matter how hard you try to make it so. At its best it is inefficient, and at its worst it is the prime example for corruption and greed. If government equaled charity, Christ would have come to save Rome.

I DON'T CARE WHERE HE WAS BORN - Its his values that we don't like

TAGS: values
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by JGalt

JGalt - October 11, 2012, 10:57 pm
Doesn't he claim this in his book?
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 11, 2012, 10:08 am

If its been proven then why is he still president?
vbattaile - October 11, 2012, 8:56 am
He's a natural born Kenyan regardless of birthplace... In any case, his birth certificate has been proven to be a forged document which besides being a federal criminal offence can only mean one thing- birth in Kenya



" PLAYBOY PLAYMATE MISS OCTOBER 2011 AMANDA CERNY TEBOWING " - "America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms,it will be because we destroyed ourselves. ~ A. Lincoln.

Trumpanzees -

The 'Logic' Of Trump Supporters -

Stupid Trump Quote #97 -

Donald Trump: Unfit For Command -

BILL CLINTON - Frankly, I'm fed up with politicians in Washington lecturing the rest of us about family values. Our families have values. But our government doesn’t.


JOHN EDWARDS - Mr. Democrat Family Values.


TAGS: obama liberals democrats values
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by soulsearcher

arnnatz - October 28, 2012, 5:20 pm
oooooo, sandra fluke is gonna be jealous and angry.


The man with the umbrellas -



TAGS: obama 2012 election no stature no values no truth
Rating: 4.56/5

More politifakes by ihadone

GrouchoMarxist - September 30, 2012, 4:54 pm

STEPHANOPOULOS IS RIGHT - Romney has no core values, well but maybe just a few more than Obama.!

VALUES - Makes you think

CONSERVATIVES - They claim that the Book of Leviticus condemns homosexuality, while overlooking that it tacitly condones familial incest.





TAGS: liberal values
Rating: 3/5

More politifakes by PapaFox

Renza - April 5, 2013, 5:47 pm
Nor have you explained how its fine to force people to take on and pay the expenses for the potential child and provide it care. So far the argument sounds pretty discriminatory towards women's rights while also being a potential waste of taxpayers money
Renza - April 5, 2013, 5:43 pm
You still haven't addressed how the rights of something that cannot function on its own can be infringed upon. What makes a bio mass any more deserving than say a cow or a dog from a factual non moralistic basis? or how its ok to attack mothers' rights.
Renza - April 5, 2013, 5:39 pm
It qualifies as being biologically alive, as are brain dead and coma patients. And independent brain function beyond being biologically alive and base level function like breathing or motor functions, is speculation.
falconfan00 - April 5, 2013, 1:31 pm
You've failed to address why Independent brain function, independent motor function, and the capacity to feel pain independent of the mother don't quality as life. Or were you gonna continue to ignore those? That squashes your brain dead/coma argument.
Renza - April 5, 2013, 1:25 pm
sounds like someone should try harder :)
Renza - April 5, 2013, 1:23 pm
On top of that, you still have yet to explain your basis for a bio mass having rights. What evidence do you have that they have consciousness or free will that can be infringed upon? We make decisions like this for brain dead and coma patients.
falconfan00 - April 5, 2013, 1:20 pm
WHAT???? Maybe you should wait to get high until after class is over.
Renza - April 5, 2013, 1:20 pm
Also, your argument is still incomplete. As you are agreeing, it is an estimate, it is useful for generalized things, not individual cases. If you want to cite ones that can live on their own, it would need to be determined case by case to be accurate.
Renza - April 5, 2013, 1:18 pm
whether you believe in something or not has no bearing on its existence. I thought you wanted this to be based on facts rather than meaningless finger pointing and moralistic values?
falconfan00 - April 5, 2013, 11:34 am
I thoguht liberals didn't believe in Death Row. Oh, i see. You do. But only for infants. Just not for convicted murderers, serial killers and serial rapists. Gotcha.
falconfan00 - April 5, 2013, 11:32 am
The 86% is an estimate. It's an estimate from the U.S. National Library of Medicine, to be exact. To pretend its not applicable to cases is very dumb. Of course it's applicable. It's a verifiable, measured rate of success.
Renza - April 5, 2013, 11:24 am
And objectively speaking, it would be more accurate to compare harvesting organs from a death row inmate rather than a healthy person. The inmate is gonna die, so is the fetus that's marked for abortion. Therefore, you have a new stream of resources.
Renza - April 5, 2013, 11:23 am
86% is purely an estimate, not an actual confirmation of survival. In addition to that, its a generalized estimate or statistic, and is therefore not applicable to individual cases, so therefore your argument is incomplete.
falconfan00 - April 4, 2013, 8:34 pm
This statement is dumb. Because someone thought something was bad, no facts are therefore applicable. That's so much nonsense it's pathetic.
falconfan00 - April 4, 2013, 8:32 pm
Saying partial birth aborted dead babies is a source of biological resource material is like saying a healthy person you want dead is just an organ donor. /FAIL. If it has 86% of survival, its conscious. Another crackpot attempt.
falconfan00 - April 4, 2013, 8:28 pm
The question was, "how do i propose confirming it can survive normally?" The answer, since you missed it was it has an 86% chance. Making me repeat this shows outright denial on your part.
Renza - April 4, 2013, 5:06 pm
I imagine at this point anyone who just read that probably had a horrible thought of some kind, which brings it back to the original point that it *is* an issue of morality, rather than an issue of facts. After all, it does more or less, involve humans.
Renza - April 4, 2013, 5:03 pm
...and they're a potential source of biological resource material. versus (arguably subjective) restricting the rights of something that is biologically alive, but may or may not be able to survive normally, and not determined to have consciousness yet.
Renza - April 4, 2013, 5:00 pm
Informative, but doesn't really answer the question. Objectively speaking, I imagine they could harvest stem cells from there somewhere... so far we have babys are expensive, give nothing back for 15-20 years, and it would restrict the mothers rights...
falconfan00 - April 4, 2013, 4:50 pm
Most partial birth abortions occur after after the baby is past the 6 1/2 month stage. Were a child born prematurely at this stage, todays hospitals give the child an 86% chance of survival, increasing dramatically as the age increases.
falconfan00 - April 4, 2013, 4:48 pm
He then inserts a catheter (tube) into the wound, and removes the baby's brain with a powerful suction machine. This causes the skull to collapse, after which the abortionist completes the delivery of the now-dead baby.
falconfan00 - April 4, 2013, 4:47 pm
...the womb). The abortionist punctures the base of the baby’s skull with a surgical instrument, such as a long surgical scissors or a pointed hollow metal tube called a trochar.
falconfan00 - April 4, 2013, 4:47 pm
Partial-Birth Abortion is a procedure in which the abortionist pulls a living baby feet-first out of the womb and into the birth ca*** (v*****), except for the head, which the abortionist purposely keeps lodged just inside the cervix (the opening to....
Renza - April 4, 2013, 4:44 pm
Aside from basically pulling it out and checking, how do you propose confirming it can survive normally (ie, without intensive care)? Also, it's not really being denied care, this takes place before that's necessary.
falconfan00 - April 4, 2013, 4:31 pm
No, the argument is about individual rights. A life is being taken, a life that could live, with standard hospital care, is being denied that care. Isn't that, like, the purpose of Obamacare? To provide care to those who cannot get it on their own?
Renza - April 4, 2013, 4:29 pm
And as there's no scientific evidence as to when life or consciousness begins, until separated from it's mother, it's technically a part of her body, in which case restrictions on it would be limiting her individual rights.
Renza - April 4, 2013, 4:25 pm
...If you want facts, technically no baby can survive unless we give it food, shelter, education, and medical care. to ban abortions would force people to simply give these things out, quite a lot too, estimated up to about 350k by the time its an adult.
Renza - April 4, 2013, 4:18 pm
I'm afraid you're misunderstanding me if you think I'm trying to force morals or that I think the argument needs to be about it. I'm saying that the argument *is* about it, as there are so few relevant facts involved...
falconfan00 - April 4, 2013, 9:06 am
Funny... Here is the conservative, making his arguments based on the scientific, and here is the liberal, attempting to force a morales argument that no one is particularly interested in having. Can we please just discuss facts? ;)
falconfan00 - April 4, 2013, 9:03 am
Whoops... you've caught me. I am against the dismemberment of babies. Still, as I've previously stated, i'm willing to concede the morale ground and debate strictly on the scientific, which i've clearly shown.
Renza - April 3, 2013, 8:41 pm
"you get no moral credit for forcing other people to do what you think is right." - " To elaborate, i'm against it because it's a barbaric, horrible, disgusting practice that is a stain on our society." :D
Renza - April 3, 2013, 8:39 pm
see, case and point, I referenced abortion as a general subject of people forcing their morality on others, and you wanted to change it to something that better suited your denial of judging something you do.
Renza - April 3, 2013, 8:37 pm
you're right that you are easy ;) I wasn't actually involved in any original argument, I just saw that ridiculous statement about forcing morality and figured it would be worthwhile to point it out. I was correct. You've been running around it since.
falconfan00 - April 3, 2013, 5:31 pm
...and these are just a few simple, practical FACTS that are readily available to us. I a**ume those facts are inconvenient for the the garden variety liberal, but they remain facts just the same. Not opinions. I use those facts to draw my conclusion.
falconfan00 - April 3, 2013, 5:27 pm
I base my argument that an fetus at say, 8 months, is an independent life form, and i base this purely on scientific evidence. Not opinion. Independent brain function, independent motor function, the capacity to feel pain independent of the mother, ...
falconfan00 - April 3, 2013, 5:23 pm
i did not say this. This is an attempt to manipulate my statement. Poor form. I thought you were for facts, and here you are twisting words in an attempt to discredit. Surely you can do better than this.
falconfan00 - April 3, 2013, 5:13 pm
Oh, i think i'm fairly aware of what you're arguing for. You couldn't win the original argument, therefore you pounced on my comment regarding abortion as a tangent argument, i a**ume in part to avoid the intial one. But i'm easy. I'll play along.
falconfan00 - April 3, 2013, 5:03 pm
Did you look at the pictures yet?
Renza - April 3, 2013, 4:25 pm
You are correct that you can be for or against something regardless of facts or social opinions. But like the earth being round facts are facts regardless of them being believed. On this particular subject though, the argued points are purely opinion.
Renza - April 3, 2013, 4:21 pm
On top of that, you're under the mistaken impression that I'm arguing for or against anything. I'm simply pointing out the hypocrisy of being against one morality while trying to push your own. Abortion is just the easiest subject to use in this case.
Renza - April 3, 2013, 4:19 pm
...You're merely trying to change the subject to avoid the fact that you've already spoken against forcing people to do things based on morality, while you're still arguing on this point that people should be banned from something based on morality.
Renza - April 3, 2013, 4:17 pm
No, I understand completely, you're choosing to refuse to admit that your argument is solely based on opinion as there is no scientific consensus in existence for when life begins...
falconfan00 - April 3, 2013, 2:17 pm
Your need for this to be based on morals is very telling. And your opinion does matter. Did you google the pictures yet? I just want you to be absolutely certain of what it is your arguing for. Call it an exercise in gathering the facts.
falconfan00 - April 3, 2013, 2:12 pm
You seem to be struggling to grasp the concept. I am against it based on both social and scientific grounds (as well as practical common sense) that we shouldn't be murdering children that would otherwise survive outside the womb given standard care.
crankyhead - April 3, 2013, 2:12 pm
Oddly enough, there are still those who refuse to believe the earth is round. I get what you're saying though, falcon.
Renza - April 3, 2013, 2:09 pm
so basically, you're indirectly admitting that you're against it due to morals (or "opinion" if you prefer, as its the same thing). My opinion on the matter is irrelevant as I am not for placing restrictions on peoples rights for it.
falconfan00 - April 3, 2013, 12:52 pm
One can have a view for or against something based on social and/or scientific evidence regardless of there being an established consensus on the subject. Someone believed the Earth was round once, and at the time that was not the prevailing consensus.
falconfan00 - April 3, 2013, 12:45 pm
I said I was against partial birth abortion. To elaborate, i'm against it because it's a barbaric, horrible, disgusting practice that is a stain on our society. We're better than this. Are you for partial birth abortion, against it, or plead the 5th?
Renza - April 3, 2013, 12:41 pm
So either you are for individual rights which is pro choice, or you are against them based on an ideology that stems from religion or moral views as there is no social or scientific consensus on when life begins. You're free to your opinion either way.
Renza - April 3, 2013, 12:38 pm
That is in no way an explanation, just an empty statement. You're clearly stating that you want to impede individual rights on what to do with someone's body. a fetus is a part of that body until separated, therefore, you are against individual rights.
falconfan00 - April 3, 2013, 10:37 am
Again, this is not an issue of morality. It is an issue of individual rights. I have explained this.
Renza - April 3, 2013, 10:31 am
I understand that I have no knowledge of the circumstances involved. Have you thought about the hypocrisy of the argument of fighting for your morals while fighting against other people's morals?
Renza - April 3, 2013, 10:30 am
the irony...
falconfan00 - April 3, 2013, 8:50 am
I do enjoy watching you guys drastically jump from one subject to another in hopes of deflecting from the original failed narrative. It's cute.
falconfan00 - April 3, 2013, 8:47 am
I don't care about same *** marriage. I don't care what two consenting adults do. I'd prefer to reserve the word marriage for a man and a woman, if that would diffuse any outstanding conflicts, but I don't know that it would. If they wanna marry, fine.
falconfan00 - April 2, 2013, 4:11 pm
Did you google the pictures yet? Did you see the dead little baby lying there? I'm talking about her rights. Don't be scared, loving liberal. Google the pictures.
Renza - April 2, 2013, 4:10 pm
they have no factual basis or reasoning behind the argument other than their broken morality either.
Renza - April 2, 2013, 4:08 pm
...you can keep trying to avoid the point all you want, but we both know its true. Don't get me wrong though, I'm not necessarily a fan of abortion, but I have no desire to try to enforce my - or other people's - morality in the form of law.
Renza - April 2, 2013, 4:04 pm
That is entirely ridiculous. you're correct, it is a question of individual rights, and how people are opposed to those individual rights based on their view of morality. "right" and "wrong" are purely expressions of opinion, nothing more...
crankyhead - April 2, 2013, 3:14 pm
Falcon, you said: "... you get no moral credit for forcing other people to do what you think is right..." I agree with you completely. Right wingers have no moral basis for opposing same *** marriage at all.
falconfan00 - April 2, 2013, 10:15 am
This isn't a question of morality. It is a question of infringing on another person. You can do what you will, but you cannot infringe on the rights of another person. It is a question of individual rights.
falconfan00 - April 2, 2013, 10:12 am
Did you google those pictures yet?
falconfan00 - April 2, 2013, 10:05 am
How has Wall STreet done under your president? What's the real unemployment rate these days? The sequester cut 80 billion, and it's a tragedy. 4 years ago AIG got 90 billion by themselves without a whimper from anyone.
falconfan00 - April 2, 2013, 10:03 am
That's where your wrong. Both are generous to the rich. When democrats had full control of congress, did they raise taxes, or abolish loopholes, to any oil company? Did they change the laws to force GE to pay a single dime in taxes?
PapaFox - April 2, 2013, 9:58 am
Again with the "forcibly taken" BS. That applies equally to both parties, a**uming you accept the precepts of the US Constitution. Both parties are generous. One is generous to the poor -- the other is generous to the rich.
Renza - April 2, 2013, 9:56 am
that's just trying to change the subject, I'm merely pointing out the contradiction of being for banning things based on morality while calling down others for banning other things on their morality.
Renza - April 2, 2013, 9:53 am
So, it's not generosity if you agree with your money being given to the poor, based on the fact that other people feel the same way?
falconfan00 - April 2, 2013, 9:52 am
And when those recipients of that money vote for your party on the basis of maintaining their dependence on the state, it becomes laughable to even insinuate that liberals are morally sound when all they've done is perfected the art of coercion.
falconfan00 - April 2, 2013, 9:48 am
You miss the point. Your original post implies that liberals are morally superior based on their generosity. My point is you can't be 'generous' when what you give isn't yours, but rather is forcibly taken from someone else.
PapaFox - April 2, 2013, 9:40 am
US Constitution, Section 8 - Powers of Congress: "The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes..." Do you dispute this? Do you think it should have the status of a "polite suggestion" that you can ignore if you so choose?
falconfan00 - April 2, 2013, 9:17 am
Did you google those pictures yet? C'mon, be a big man with your big liberal bleeding heart. Google them, then come back and politicize how that's just another example of our right to choose. Show us how compassionate you are.
falconfan00 - April 2, 2013, 9:10 am
You are aware that TAXES are mandatory, yes? And that refusing to pay your taxes will get you imprisoned, yes? And if you refuse prison, you will be forceably taken, yes? And the ones who take you have guns. Lots of guns. Get it?
Renza - April 2, 2013, 9:03 am
I thought it was wrong to force people to do what you think is right?
Renza - April 2, 2013, 8:56 am
Do you have a better national system in mind? If so, I would suggest trying to organize it on a small scale and build up, if it does well, you could potentially replace some existing system(s) with it. and no, that's not sarcasm.
falconfan00 - April 2, 2013, 8:53 am
I don't care about marijuana. Wanna ruin your brain? That's your call. I'm wholly content to let the states make that call. Abortions? I'm against late term partial birth abortions. Google the pictures of partial birth abortions to find out why.
Renza - April 2, 2013, 8:53 am
you're going to have to explain this gunpoint business, because it seems completely made up or a me***hor that could use some work.
Renza - April 2, 2013, 8:49 am
you mean like banning marijuana or abortions?
falconfan00 - April 2, 2013, 8:43 am
-Penn Jillete, libertarian
falconfan00 - April 2, 2013, 8:42 am
There is great joy in helping people, but no joy in doing it at gunpoint.
falconfan00 - April 2, 2013, 8:42 am
People need to be fed, medicated, educated, clothed, and sheltered, and if we’re compassionate we’ll help them, but you get no moral credit for forcing other people to do what you think is right.
falconfan00 - April 2, 2013, 8:42 am
Voting for our government to use guns to give money to help poor and suffering people is immoral self-righteous bullying laziness.
falconfan00 - April 2, 2013, 8:41 am
It’s amazing to me how many people think that voting to have the government give poor people money is compassion. Helping poor and suffering people is compassion.
Renza - April 2, 2013, 7:36 am
That sound's entirely made up falcon. I can however see how it may be difficult being a conservative in this day and age, what with the internet and high speed communications making it easier for facts to get in the way of things.
falconfan00 - April 1, 2013, 10:44 pm
Harder to be a liberal? You force others at gunpoint to give money to your voting pool who in turn vote to keep you in power. sounds like a pretty sweet gig to me.
Rudedog - April 1, 2013, 10:10 pm
Wow, so condescending without substance. Kind of like Royko.



TAGS: democratic values
Rating: 3/5

More politifakes by PapaFox

PeteofSanJose - April 2, 2013, 1:01 am
Using this poster then, Obama shouldnt be paid. He hasnt done an honest days work yet

CONSERVATIVE VALUES - They speak volumes.

MINORITY REPRESENTATION - No wonder the parties treat minorities differently.

TAGS: minority values
Rating: 3/5

More politifakes by PapaFox

PapaFox - April 2, 2013, 8:27 am
Facts trump rhetoric.
Renza - April 2, 2013, 7:54 am
Not gonna lie, I would be a bit surprised to hear there were even 50 minority republican politicians in this country. I'm sure it's possible, just seems unlikely.
Rudedog - April 2, 2013, 12:19 am
Unable to commit without being portrayed as racist, elitist, politically incorrect, and insensitive to minorities. Playing the race/minority card trumps logics in politics. Well done.


Conservative Values -

TAGS: conservative values
Rating: 2.71/5

More politifakes by PapaFox

Rudedog - May 2, 2013, 10:41 pm
I've always opposed suffering women, dirty water fountains, poorly displayed danger signs and a**holes.

REPUBLICAN VALUES - Oh those wacky conservatives!

REPUBLICAN LOGIC - No entitlements! As long our rich masters are happy, we’re happy.

TAGS: republican values
Rating: 2.6/5

More politifakes by PapaFox

PapaFox - January 11, 2013, 7:36 am
Yeah, not like we EVER see that kind of thing around here... ;)
Rudedog - January 10, 2013, 9:45 pm
PFox wow. Talk about your partisan shock value
PapaFox - January 10, 2013, 9:07 pm
That made absolutely no sense whatsoever...
foxrecon19d - January 10, 2013, 8:20 pm
DEMOCRAT LOGIC- Voted for Democrat Politicians who already said they were going to make Americans unemployed...Became "shocked" thay they are unemployed. Then blamed Republicans for the Democrats' actions...just as Democrats were programed to do.

FAMILY VALUES - Liberal Style

FAMILY VALUES - Republican Style

TAGS: family values gop
Rating: 2.5/5

More politifakes by PapaFox

deerbag2 - April 5, 2013, 12:05 am
you've got to be [email protected] me

FAMILY VALUES - Republican Style

CONSERVATIVE VALUES - They've changed for the worse.

"AVERAGE" AMERICANS - Republican politicians use a different definition than the rest of us.



REPUBLICAN VALUES - Strangely narrow.

BRISTOL PALIN - She didn't use contraception, she prac- ticed abstinence--and she still had a kid outta wedlock. Funny how that happened...

EYE OF NEWT - 3rd time is a charm

Democrat values vs. American ones -

Democrat values vs. American ones -

Black Belt Patriotism -

TAGS: chuck norris black belt patriotism conservative values american exceptionalism reclaim america
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

fauxnews - May 22, 2015, 11:12 am
Chuck is like bacon. Makes everything better X-D

Democrat values vs. American ones -

TAGS: democrat values
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by ScatXXVII

Cyberhagen - May 27, 2017, 11:52 am
Also, the one one on the left will not train her young children to go blow themselves up.
freasy - May 24, 2017, 9:08 am
The one holding the bible also has proper trigger discipline.

Liberal vs. Conservative -

TAGS: liberal conservative family values mayberry
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by coastwatcher42

truthteller - May 24, 2016, 6:02 pm
Good call. Trump ain't a conservative. He's a sellout
coastwatcher42 - May 24, 2016, 3:20 pm
What does Trump have to do with being Conservative? By the way, the word "retarded" isn't politically correct!
fauxnews - May 24, 2016, 1:05 pm
"But Dad, Trump is a womanizing s-ex addict who attacks P.O.W.s, hates Muslims and blacks, was called UnChristian by our Pope, dodged the drafts, and lies all the time. He's family values?"Dad:"We're Republicans,son.We're retarded,remember?" Son:"Oh,yeah"

Through the Looking Glass -

Idiotic Trump Supporters -

Trumpanzees -

Stupid Trump Quote #132 -

TAGS: donald trump rino fake republican fraud charlatan bully con artist tyrant despot autocrat dictator authoritarian fascist new york liberal values billionaire elitist big government progressive totalitarian crony capitalist
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

Curlyrocks - March 7, 2016, 11:34 am
I know you're trying to steer the Republican base away from Trump with these, but these are Fing hilarious, you might end up steering Democrats and others who are disappointed with the Republican party toward him.

The Donald Says Apple For Me, Not For Thee -

You Really Want This Idiot To Be Commander In Chief?!! -

Stupid Trump Quote #76 -


Mr. Bankruptcy -

The Donald's Miasma Of “New York Values” -


Silly peasants.... -

TAGS: trump hillary cheater family values
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

Bandit5906 - June 26, 2016, 6:53 pm
An amateur compared to Bill Clinton!

Now would be a good time -

TAGS: trump family values playboy cheating
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

Bandit5906 - May 16, 2016, 5:29 pm
Trump's concerns are the concerns of a conservative!

Stupid Trump Quote # 108 -

The 'Logic' Of Trumpism -

The Clinton Playbook -

The Biggest Deniers of Republican Values -